Thursday, January 27, 2011
Wholesale Double Ring
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Aspirating On Own Vomit
____________________ (1) We know that this force is due to the vapor tension that seeks to occupy a space ten -seven hundred times greater than that of water from which it emanates.
(2) That is to say, 120 horses working eight hours a day.
Ebay Scam Empty Package
Monday, January 24, 2011
Can I Put Amlactin On My Face
is a category "Heterosexism" for documents that address the most violence-specific sociality hetero, or histories of violence within a heterosexual.
boundaries are blurred, some es LBGTQI ¹ ² or TPG sometimes have a (long) lived in heter @, or the mechanisms of oppression are comparable (or even the same), an e-LGBTQI ¹ ² or TPG will recognize in some stories of violence in heterosexual and vice versa.
This blog is not to read in small pieces, some of the issues raised by text are answered in another text.
violence can be addressed in isolation and being confined to a group, an individual-e-e, how to respond is necessarily diverse, complex, etc.
¹ LGBT Lesbian Gay Bi Trans / QI: Queer or "concerned" and Intersex or intergender
² TPG Transpédégouine
Friday, January 21, 2011
Spondylitis Ayurvedic Treatment
Refrigerated Cargo Van
Talking about violence in urban activist inevitably generates rejection reactions, opposing stances and attacks on the methodology, people and / or group concerned. According to some people, violence considered private should remain in private. This is the method used in the home to stifle the voices of abused people and the best way not to call into question the structure which admits or legitimate violence. This text should enable Pink Panthers react when they are acquired by a person alleging violence between individuals in the community activists, specifically in cases of violence that make sharing space activists needed.
This reflection is inspired by and is in line with the work produced by other feminist collectives (see bibliography below).
denunciation of violence and the fight against them is a component of feminist struggle in the same way that actions and deliberations on gender, labor, discrimination and oppression. This fight is part of the belief that the personal is political, which leads to reject the privatization of these questions by referring to the individual field. Attention, querying and the collective treatment of internal problems in our movements is a legacy of the feminist movement.
We are aware that violence can be exercised even within our current policy and not just the fact of men outside. We denounce the belief that sometimes being that women are only victims of sexism, unable to produce or to relay the violence. We assume that the nominees are not as violent monsters to ostracize, but the product of a society that is structured by violence.
We question the principle of equality between people which refers to attackers and attacked same responsibilities and induces participation assaulted in the outbreak of violence in order to minimize its scope.
means that we seek to implement are to: * Avoid
self-exclusion of militants attacked areas where they do not want to be in the presence of their abuser. Without mediation, the division of space is always in favor of the aggressor.
* Allow Assault to talk in confidence to the violence. To address the doubts and questioning commonly observed in the process of accepting the position of having been assaulted. Awareness and disclosure of violence take time so we need help speaking with a position of trust that can overcome the taboo. * The
ensure they are not at fault in causing the violence. The violence result in feelings of shame and guilt against which he must fight. *
empower them to decide on collective action to take.
* Make visible and conscious in the feminist community violence may exist within it. Thus people who experience them perceive that beyond a personal history it is a structural issue. This issue must be addressed politically and collectively. * Avoid
ostracization aggressors. For example, mediation may be to establish a sharing of spaces defined by the victim of violence, the perpetrator and others. It seeks to enable assaulted as the attackers to keep a space for activism and socializing rather than creating antagonistic groups, ineffective in managing these situations.
* Banish violence in our communities. Our violence must be conscious and worked to direct them toward real political enemies.
To achieve these objectives we are careful to maintain a collective approach in which we share a common consensus for further action.
order not to expose those involved in personal attacks, we wish to maintain their anonymity. In addition, we recognize that customization defer attention to individuals at the expense of developing a solution.
We do not allow ourselves to judge anyone, nor abusers, nor attacked.
We take into account the difficulties that may encounter assaulted speak and we listen to what they mean.
We do not require explanation or evidence other than what they choose to say.
We have no requirement on the attitude of assault (there is no "right" attitude), subject in turn to exercise violence.
We aim to create a safe space which does not question that said the victim of violence.
We are working together to put actions in place, ensuring that they are bearable and assumed for the abused, the abusers and the collective.
We do not want a conviction, we work for the victim of violence, not to the disadvantage of the aggressor.
Seeking mediation is a tool that can be used to raise awareness to the abuser what happened and find ways that allow the victim of violence for peaceful evolution in space activists.
In case of failure or refusal of mediation in cases of non compliance with the agreement of the mediation, the only tool at our disposal is the temporary sidelining of the aggressor space activist order 'presence will allow the victim of violence. This solution does not satisfy us, an alternative must be found.
We encourage the establishment of a framework that allows an attacker can work on their acts of violence in confidence and without trial.
Spaces activists
We deplore any violence destabilizes visibilization spaces activists and generates a climate of distrust. Minimization or denial of the Word of assault is an attempt to circumvent the political question raised collectively. Attempts turnaround led by the attackers are common and must be defused.
We want spaces activists can ask questions and deal with violence in it because it moves us forward in developing our projects and utopias. The guarantee of safe spaces for any consolidation ties and strengthen us in the struggle. Our ability to work all the questions, even the most uncomfortable, we can reflect and address gender-based mechanisms at work in society and, inevitably, through us.
Bibliography
* washing your linen in public http://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/lav ...
* Support a Survivor: http://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/sou ... *
violence in lesbian couples: http://www.lecrips.net/L/doc/L5.pdf
* Consent: http://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/le_ ... *
the association's website * Free air
texts on rape and violence against women in media alternos on the site how many times 4 years
note debate We seek to further elaborate on this subject with groups and individuals with a feminist reflection on this subject. We will publish all contributions that clarify, contradict, complement and refine the proposals in this text. is why this text is open to comments moderated. This does not mean that the Pink Panthers agree with the content and assume simply that we believe that these contributions are useful for reflection. We continue our discussion with these inputs, leading to the drafting of a text richer. We hope that this text contributes to the initiation of work in other groups and that exchanges take place on this subject.
How To Continue Playing In Rtw Campaign
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Ooh And Ahh Plush Toys
Castilian ------------- -------------
Mood and greetings to the Assembly Housing Barrilonia.
http://mambo.pimienta.org/2011/01/05/comunicado-en-todas-partes-se-cuecen-habas
Press
Housing Assembly Barrilonia before the attacks raised in our environment: "Everywhere are baked beans"
Cesar Zuniga, a member of the group CSOA barricades Barrilonia and Zapatista, sexually assaulted her at different times of the summer of 2009, three sisters living in home. In November of that year the people attacked explained what had happened at a meeting of women from home. At that time, Cesar decided to deny access to housing (although not living at home, was active in the community life of the same.) In communicating the decision to Caesar, he recognized the "harassment" to two of the sisters but did not recognize the third attack, more serious than the other two classifications, if fit, given the high degree of trust between him and the person assaulted and taking into account the situation of vulnerability in which she was being assaulted when (I was asleep). In an extraordinary meeting of housing
discovered the double play that Cesar was carrying out: first admitted the third attack in front of the victim while at the same time denying the facts to the people in your group (Zapatista barricades), calling the measure of the house " political plot "and try and save his own image and open the possibility of challenging the allegation of assault. Only from the moment it became clear that this move, he admitted all the facts.
Since they knew the attacks committed by Cesar, there were different positions inside the house on the subject, both in relation to a collective response that housing should have been given to the attacks gender and sex, and the possibility of opening or not a process of dialogue with the aggressor. What was assumed as a collective minimum is that Cesar did not enter the house, at least that continues to this day.
Months later, in April, Cesar made a written request to share with the people of the house a process of reflection on what had happened, expressing the will he had to "repair the harm" he had done. After a meeting with him, he dismissed the possibility of a joint reflection process, as it was not that he had a real desire to question their actions and attitudes, and assess the severity of the situation. Taking into account, inter alia, that at the meeting he would put as a condition for initiating this collective reflection, his reinstatement in the house.
Barrilonia internal organization works in a way that the CSOA and housing assemblies are managed by different and totally independent of each other (with a few people who are part of both) and now these two areas are cut off physically. Thus, Cesar is expelled from home, but to this day continues its normal activity in the CSOA. The absence of position on the subject by the CSOA assembly is the result of the central role and power of that Caesar has in this space, so and the lack of reflection on the attacks and sexist gender roles by many of those who shape the CSOA. Acts that involve the complicity and support it has offered and offers most of the people of CSOA.
The other attack that we mentioned, was committed by Khalifa, known in some social movements as "the Underground" hip-hop anti-racist. In late September 2010 a resident of the house exposed to the housing assembly of sexual aggression perpetrated by the latter, taking advantage of the moment of physical vulnerability in which the person was attacked and push the boundaries that she was making. The assembly of the house took the decision to expel him, following the line against the aggressions that we are weaving. Khalifa's first reaction was to deny the facts and take an arrogant attitude and refusing to listen without wanting to understand the gravity of the situation. A few days later and the person assaulted Khalifa met in the street and he admitted the facts but maintained its position of not regarded as assault. This meeting resulted in a chase with threats from him. This expulsion was not well received by some of the people of CSOA that empathizing with the figure of the aggressor and racist accusing the decision of the house, came to consider in November to give consideration to ceiling in the room, but eventually rejected.
Given the long and arduous process that has occurred (and continues) in the house in relation to the positioning that everyone takes against sexual assault and gender, not until today that it has given the position to make public and collectively, all this history through this release. This process has led to serious ruptures internal conflicts without running back and people who have left home. The main reason that leads us to do now is political commitment assumed by the info on what happened to circulate and thus enable people and groups that have positions of rejection against assault sexist, know of these cases and to take sides in this regard.
do not want the reading of this statement is reduced to the simplistic, comfortable position to condemn the events without making a critical first person around the way we relate. What is to be perpetuated attitudes similar to those that here we have decided NOT TOLERATE.
In this regard, some of those who have experienced the process from the home of Barrilonia we are developing written material for reflection and analysis on how they have handled these attacks and the different positions that have emerged within the intention of publishing house later.
Vivenda Assembly of Barrilonia
December 31, 2010
barriloniaksa@gmail.com
Press the house of assembly Barrilònia towards aggression that have occurred around us, "everywhere is cueca Haba"
Since we started in squat in June 2009, there have been several sexual and sexist , committed by people of the area directly next to the house (CSOA) or lived there at that time.
From the house of assembly Barrilònia have taken the decision to make public the following:
Cesar Zuñiga, a member of CSOA Barrilònia and the Zapatista Barrikada, sexually assaulted at different times during the summer of 2009, three colleagues who lived in the house. In November the same year the girls were assaulted explained what had happened to Caesar in an assembly of girls in the house. At the same time it was decided the expulsion of the house of Caesar (although not live in the building, was very present in their community life). In communicating to him the decision, the Caesar recognized the "assetjatment" two companies but did not attack with the third, more serious than the other two classifications, if fit, given the high degree of
trust that existed between him and Girl assaulted and given the vulnerability that she was at the time of the attack (he was sleeping). In an extraordinary assembly of rooms was discovered the double game that Cesar was carried out: one third admitted the assault against the girl while the other, denying the facts facing the people of their collective (Barrikada Zapatista), calling the measure "political plot" and an attempt to save his image and open the possibility of challenging the charge of aggression. Only from the moment that this move was obvious, he admitted all the facts. Since it was learned of the assaults by Cesar there were different attitudes towards the subject inside the house, both as regards the response as a collective property should be given to sexist attacks and / or sexual, as regards the possibility of or not open a dialogue with the aggressor. What was assumed as a minimum that the group is not Caesar entered the house, at least it remains today.
Months later, in April, the Caesar made a written request to share with the people of the house a process of reflection about what had happened, expressing the wish that it had to "repair the damage" they had done. After a meeting with him he dismissed the possibility of initiating a process of joint because he was not had any real intention of questioning their actions and attitudes or to assess the seriousness of the situation. Taking into account, inter alia, that put him in the said meeting as a requirement to start this thought his readmission to the common house. The internal organization of Barrilònia works so that the CSOA and housing assemblies are managed by different and totally independent of each other (with a few people who are part of both) and now the two spaces are physically isolated . Thus, Caesar is expelled housing, but this day continues with its normal activity CSOA. The absence of position on the issue by the assembly that manages CSOA is the result of the central role and power of the Caesar has in this space as well as the lack of consideration towards the aggressions and sexist roles genre for most of the people who are part of CSOA. These events will involve the complicity and support that has been offered
and offers most of the people CSOA. The other
aggression that we speak, was committed by at Khalifa, known in some social movements as the 'Clandestino', hip-hop singer racist. A late September 2010 a resident of the dwelling house of assembly outlined the sexual assault perpetrated by this, even physical abuse at the time of vulnerability when he was assaulted and crossing the boundaries that she was checking . The assembly of the house he took the measure to expel him, following the line against the aggressions that we weave. Khalifa's first reaction was to deny the facts and take an arrogant attitude and lack of listening, without wanting to understand the gravity of the situation. A few days later, the Khalifa and the girl who was assaulted was found on the street and he admitted the facts, but kept his position not consider them an insult. This meeting resulted in a chase with threats by him. The expulsion was not welcomed by some people's social center, empathize with the figure of the assailants and accused of making racist as the house, came in November to consider the option of welcoming him to the premises, but was later dismissed.
Given the long and difficult process that has occurred (and continues) to the house in relation to each position taken against the sexual and sexist, is not so far been given the status of power published as a collective whole story and so write this statement. This process has led to serious ruptures internal conflicts without going back and people who have left home. The main reason that leads us to do now is the political commitment to assume that information about what happened and circulate possible, so that people or groups who have positions of rejection against the sexist attacks know of these cases and to take sides on this.
Tammateix want the reading of this statement is not limited to the posture simplistan and comfortable, seriously assess the facts in this space, but also avoiding the first-person reflection around how we relate. That assumes that the perpetuation attitudes similar to those here have decided not tolerate.
In this line, some people have experienced the process from the house of Barrilonia are preparing written material for reflection and analysis on how these attacks have been managed and the different positions that have arisen in the house with the intention post them later.
Assembly Housing Barrilònia
of 31 December two thousand and ten
barriloniaksa@gmail.com
Breath Smells Of Smoke
on proposed solutions that evoked by "how are you girls?" to have recourse to the police is not necessarily an option that is in the process of the blog "how many times 4 years", but will not be as developed real opportunities militant alternative to guard and defend themselves against domestic violence between lesbians (and others), we can only support these choices by default.